eSentire vs Kroll: MDR Comparison 2026
eSentire (Pure-play MDR) and Kroll (MDR provider) take different approaches to managed detection and response. eSentire works with your existing tools, while Kroll works with your existing tools. eSentire targets SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise organizations; Kroll focuses on SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise.
Key Differences at a Glance
Winner by Category
eSentire vs Kroll: Which Should You Choose?
Choose eSentire if:
- •Mid-market and enterprise organizations needing active remediation, not just alerts
- •Critical infrastructure sectors
- •Organizations with complex multi-vendor security stacks requiring 300+ integrations
Choose Kroll if:
- •Organizations wanting IR expertise built into MDR -- 3,000+ annual cases feeding detection, not just monitoring
- •Enterprises needing full threat eradication including forensics and root cause analysis, not just containment
- •Regulated industries needing compliance reporting, IR pedigree, and included $1M breach warranty
- •Breach warranty matters to you (Kroll offers one, eSentire does not)
Bottom line: eSentire (Pure-play MDR) and Kroll (MDR provider) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize eSentire's esentire excels at active, hands-on response with contractual 15-minute containment guarantees or Kroll's kroll responder's differentiator is depth of real-world ir experience: 3,000+ annual breach inves....
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between eSentire and Kroll?
eSentire is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Kroll is a MDR provider that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). SLA commitments differ: eSentire offers ≤15 minutes, Kroll offers Not disclosed.
How do eSentire and Kroll differ in response capabilities?
eSentire supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Kroll supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable.
How does eSentire pricing compare to Kroll?
eSentire pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Kroll pricing: Not publicly disclosed. Unverified field estimates suggest $30K-$200K+/year depending on scope.. Watch for with eSentire: Tier differences significant — Essentials may lack key response capabilities; BYOL pricing differs from bundled Atlas Agent pricing. Watch for with Kroll: CrowdStrike Falcon Complete migration (Dec 2025) increases platform dependency -- customers wanting vendor-agnostic EDR lose that flexibility; Named TAM support (vs. Shared TAM) likely incurs additional cost; cost delta not disclosed.
Should I choose eSentire or Kroll?
Choose eSentire if: mid-market and enterprise organizations needing active remediation, not just alerts. Choose Kroll if: organizations wanting IR expertise built into MDR -- 3,000+ annual cases feeding detection, not just monitoring. eSentire is not ideal for budget-constrained SMBs seeking the lowest-cost MDR option. Kroll is not ideal for organizations that need vendor-agnostic EDR choice (CrowdStrike migration reduces flexibility).