Deepwatch vs Mandiant: MDR Comparison 2026
Deepwatch (Pure-play MDR) and Mandiant (Services firm) take different approaches to managed detection and response. Deepwatch works with your existing tools, while Mandiant works with your existing tools. Deepwatch targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Mandiant focuses on Mid-market and Enterprise.
Key Differences at a Glance
Winner by Category
Deepwatch vs Mandiant: Which Should You Choose?
Choose Deepwatch if:
- •Mid-market to enterprise organizations with existing Splunk, Google SecOps, or Microsoft Sentinel SIEM investments
- •Companies wanting a dedicated named team (Squad model) rather than rotating anonymous analysts
- •AWS-heavy environments leveraging Deepwatch's Level 1 MSSP Competency partnership
- •You want direct Slack integration with your SOC
Choose Mandiant if:
- •Enterprise organizations wanting elite threat intelligence integrated directly into MDR operations
- •Google Cloud Platform customers wanting native SecOps integration
- •Organizations facing nation-state or advanced persistent threats where Mandiant's frontline IR experience is critical
Bottom line: Deepwatch (Pure-play MDR) and Mandiant (Services firm) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Deepwatch's siem-centric, vendor-agnostic mdr with a patented drs engine (98% fp reduction), dedicated squad ... or Mandiant's threat intelligence-driven mdr backed by 500+ intel analysts, frontline ir experience, and google....
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between Deepwatch and Mandiant?
Deepwatch is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Mandiant is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools).
How do Deepwatch and Mandiant differ in response capabilities?
Deepwatch supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Mandiant supports 2 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable.
How does Deepwatch pricing compare to Mandiant?
Deepwatch pricing: Average ~$220K/year; maximum ~$315K for large deployments (per Vendr data). Mandiant pricing: Estimated ~$83,000/year (third-party estimate from Vendr, not officially published).. Watch for with Deepwatch: Volume-based pricing means unexpected data growth can cause cost spikes; Three platform tiers (Core, Advanced, Enterprise) — critical response capabilities may be gated behind higher tiers. Watch for with Mandiant: ~$83K+/year estimated — premium enterprise pricing; IR retainer is separate — must be purchased independently for full incident response.
Should I choose Deepwatch or Mandiant?
Choose Deepwatch if: mid-market to enterprise organizations with existing Splunk, Google SecOps, or Microsoft Sentinel SIEM investments. Choose Mandiant if: enterprise organizations wanting elite threat intelligence integrated directly into MDR operations. Deepwatch is not ideal for sMBs or budget-constrained organizations — average $220K/year pricing is enterprise-oriented. Mandiant is not ideal for sMBs or budget-constrained organizations — ~$83K+/year estimated pricing.