Cyderes vs eSentire: MDR Comparison 2026
Detailed comparison of Cyderes and eSentire managed detection and response services. Compare response capabilities, SLA, coverage, integrations, and compliance.
Winner by Category
Response Level
Tie
Same level
SLA Speed
eSentire
Faster response time
Coverage Breadth
Tie
Same coverage
Integrations
eSentire
More integration options
Criteria
eSentire excels at active, hands-on response with contractual 15-minute containment guarantees. The multi-signal Atlas XDR platform and Elite Threat Hunters make it a strong choice for organizations that want their MDR provider to truly 'own the R' across endpoint, network, cloud, and identity.
Response Type
Active Remediation
Active Remediation
Approval Policy
N/A
Configurable
Auto-Isolate
✗
✓
Kill Process
✗
✓
IR Included
Separate
✓ Included
Response SLA
Not disclosed
≤15 minutes
24/7 Coverage
✓ Yes
✓ Yes
Channels
N/A
TeamsEmailPortalPhone
Data Access
N/A
Dashboards
Model
Not published
Custom pricing; three tiers (Essentials, Advanced, Complete) with BYOL or bundled agent options
Price Range
Not published
Not published
Minimum Seats
N/A
None
Threat Hunting
N/A
✓ Included
Overall
N/A
Positive
Summary
N/A
Respected for prioritizing the 'R' in MDR with hands-on active response and contractual containment times. Strong multi-signal approach. Some price sensitivity noted for SMBs.
Cyderes vs eSentire: Which Should You Choose?
Choose Cyderes if:
- You need active remediation
- Not disclosed response time meets your needs
- You prefer technology agnostic solutions
- Your org size: Mid-market / Enterprise
Choose eSentire if:
- You need active remediation
- ≤15 minutes response time meets your needs
- You prefer technology agnostic solutions
- Your org size: SMB / Mid-market / Enterprise
FAQ
What's the main difference between Cyderes and eSentire?
Key differences: response model (Active Remediation vs Active Remediation), SLA (Not disclosed vs ≤15 minutes), and approach (Technology Agnostic vs Technology Agnostic).