Check Point vs ThreatLocker: MDR Comparison 2026
Detailed comparison of Check Point and ThreatLocker managed detection and response services. Compare response capabilities, SLA, coverage, integrations, and compliance.
Winner by Category
Response Level
Tie
Same level
SLA Speed
Check Point
Faster response time
Coverage Breadth
Check Point
5 vs 3 surfaces
Integrations
Tie
Similar breadth
Criteria
Enterprise-grade MDR backed by ThreatCloud AI and 450+ security experts, with an industry-leading 160+ integrations for vendor-neutral coverage. Best for organizations wanting comprehensive coverage across all attack surfaces from a vendor with deep network security heritage.
Unmatched price-to-value ratio for Zero Trust MDR. The $2-5/user pricing with 60-second response time makes it the most affordable MDR option, ideal for MSPs and SMBs already using or willing to adopt ThreatLocker.
Response Type
Active Remediation
Active Remediation
Approval Policy
Configurable
Configurable
Auto-Isolate
✓
✓
Kill Process
✓
✓
IR Included
✓ Included
Separate
Response SLA
≤30 minutes
60-second average response time
24/7 Coverage
✓ Yes
✓ Yes
Channels
EmailPortalPhone
EmailPortalPhone
Data Access
Dashboards
Dashboards
Model
Subscription-based with one-year and multi-year plans; per-user or deployment size based; three tiers (MDR, MDR 360, MXDR 360)
Per-user per-month tiered pricing
Price Range
Custom-quoted; pricing based on scale, modules, and deployment size. Generally perceived as high-end/premium pricing.
$2-$5 per user per month for MDR add-on
Minimum Seats
None
None
Threat Hunting
✓ Included
Extra cost
Overall
Mixed
Very Positive
Summary
Valued by large enterprises already in the Check Point ecosystem as a powerful security partner. Strong detection capabilities backed by ThreatCloud AI and 450+ experts. However, perceived as expensive, with licensing complexity and limited appeal outside the existing Check Point customer base.
9.2/10 on PeerSpot with 100% willingness to recommend. MSPs praise the value proposition and support quality. Zero Trust approach is highly regarded. Interface speed and complexity are noted concerns.
Check Point vs ThreatLocker: Which Should You Choose?
Choose Check Point if:
- You need active remediation
- ≤30 minutes response time meets your needs
- You prefer technology agnostic solutions
- Your org size: SMB / Mid-market / Enterprise
Choose ThreatLocker if:
- You need active remediation
- 60-second average response time response time meets your needs
- You prefer platform native solutions
- Your org size: Mid-market / SMB / Enterprise
FAQ
What's the main difference between Check Point and ThreatLocker?
Key differences: response model (Active Remediation vs Active Remediation), SLA (≤30 minutes vs 60-second average response time), and approach (Technology Agnostic vs Platform Native).