Check Point vs ThreatDown: MDR Comparison 2026
Check Point (Services firm) and ThreatDown (MDR provider) take different approaches to managed detection and response. Check Point works with your existing tools, while ThreatDown requires its own security platform. Check Point targets SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise organizations; ThreatDown focuses on SMB and Mid-market. Check Point includes 5 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 1 for ThreatDown (Endpoint).
Key Differences at a Glance
Winner by Category
Check Point vs ThreatDown: Which Should You Choose?
Choose Check Point if:
- •Large enterprises already invested in Check Point infrastructure
- •Organizations needing vendor-neutral MDR with 160+ integrations
- •Companies requiring coverage across network, endpoint, email, cloud, and IoT simultaneously
- •You need Cloud and SaaS and Identity and Network coverage included in base pricing
Choose ThreatDown if:
- •SMBs and IT-constrained mid-market organizations wanting affordable MDR with published pricing ($99/endpoint/year)
- •MSPs wanting channel-first MDR with multi-tenant OneView console and RMM integrations
- •Organizations needing fast deployment — agent installs in minutes, MDR activates immediately
- •You want direct Slack integration with your SOC
Bottom line: ThreatDown is the choice if you want a single-vendor stack with deep integration. Check Point is better if you have existing tools and want flexibility.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between Check Point and ThreatDown?
Check Point is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). ThreatDown is a MDR provider that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). SLA commitments differ: Check Point offers ≤30 minutes, ThreatDown offers Not disclosed. Check Point covers 5 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 1 for ThreatDown.
How do Check Point and ThreatDown differ in response capabilities?
Check Point supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. ThreatDown supports 3 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, file quarantine) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with Check Point and not included with ThreatDown.
How does Check Point pricing compare to ThreatDown?
Check Point pricing: Custom-quoted; pricing based on scale, modules, and deployment size. Generally perceived as high-end/premium pricing.. ThreatDown pricing: MDR included at $99/endpoint/year (Elite) or $119/endpoint/year (Ultimate). Server endpoints: $129-179/year. Mobile: $10/device. (5-seat minimum). Watch for with Check Point: Cost scales significantly with modules and user count; ATAM 360 dedicated account management is an additional subscription. Watch for with ThreatDown: Endpoint-only coverage — no cloud workload, SaaS, identity, or network monitoring; Platform-native lock-in — cannot BYO CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, or Defender.
Should I choose Check Point or ThreatDown?
Choose Check Point if: large enterprises already invested in Check Point infrastructure. Choose ThreatDown if: sMBs and IT-constrained mid-market organizations wanting affordable MDR with published pricing ($99/endpoint/year). Check Point is not ideal for sMBs with limited budgets (premium pricing). ThreatDown is not ideal for enterprise organizations needing multi-surface coverage (cloud, SaaS, identity, network, OT).