Check Point vs Huntress: MDR Comparison 2026
Check Point (Services firm) and Huntress (MSP-channel) take different approaches to managed detection and response. Check Point works with your existing tools, while Huntress requires its own security platform. Check Point targets SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise organizations; Huntress focuses on SMB and Mid-market. Check Point includes 5 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 3 for Huntress (Endpoint, SaaS, Identity).
Key Differences at a Glance
Winner by Category
Check Point vs Huntress: Which Should You Choose?
Choose Check Point if:
- •Large enterprises already invested in Check Point infrastructure
- •Organizations needing vendor-neutral MDR with 160+ integrations
- •Companies requiring coverage across network, endpoint, email, cloud, and IoT simultaneously
- •You need Cloud and Network coverage included in base pricing
Choose Huntress if:
- •MSPs wanting a channel-first MDR partner with multi-tenant management and volume pricing
- •SMBs needing affordable, enterprise-grade MDR with minimal overhead (deploys in 30 minutes)
- •Microsoft 365-heavy environments needing integrated identity threat detection (ITDR with 3-min MTTR)
Bottom line: Huntress is the choice if you want a single-vendor stack with deep integration. Check Point is better if you have existing tools and want flexibility.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between Check Point and Huntress?
Check Point is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Huntress is a MSP-channel that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). SLA commitments differ: Check Point offers ≤30 minutes, Huntress offers Not disclosed. Check Point covers 5 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 3 for Huntress.
How do Check Point and Huntress differ in response capabilities?
Check Point supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Huntress supports 4 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, account disable, file quarantine) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with Check Point and not included with Huntress.
How does Check Point pricing compare to Huntress?
Check Point pricing: Custom-quoted; pricing based on scale, modules, and deployment size. Generally perceived as high-end/premium pricing.. Huntress pricing: Estimated ~$2.50-$3.50/endpoint/month for EDR (community-reported). Not officially published. Volume discounts decrease price. (50-seat minimum). Watch for with Check Point: Cost scales significantly with modules and user count; ATAM 360 dedicated account management is an additional subscription. Watch for with Huntress: 50-endpoint minimum for standard plan; under 50 requires sales engagement; Each product (EDR, ITDR, SIEM, SAT) priced separately — full stack costs add up.
Should I choose Check Point or Huntress?
Choose Check Point if: large enterprises already invested in Check Point infrastructure. Choose Huntress if: mSPs wanting a channel-first MDR partner with multi-tenant management and volume pricing. Check Point is not ideal for sMBs with limited budgets (premium pricing). Huntress is not ideal for enterprise organizations needing deep SIEM integration with existing Splunk/Sentinel/Chronicle.