Check Point vs ESET: MDR Comparison 2026
Detailed comparison of Check Point and ESET managed detection and response services. Compare response capabilities, SLA, coverage, integrations, and compliance.
Winner by Category
Response Level
Tie
Same level
SLA Speed
Check Point
Faster response time
Coverage Breadth
Tie
Same coverage
Integrations
ESET
More integration options
Criteria
Enterprise-grade MDR backed by ThreatCloud AI and 450+ security experts, with an industry-leading 160+ integrations for vendor-neutral coverage. Best for organizations wanting comprehensive coverage across all attack surfaces from a vendor with deep network security heritage.
Strong SMB-focused MDR built on 30+ years of threat research, with fast 20-minute response times and accessible 25-device minimum. Best for organizations already in or willing to adopt the ESET ecosystem.
Response Type
Active Remediation
Active Remediation
Approval Policy
Configurable
Configurable
Auto-Isolate
✓
✓
Kill Process
✓
✓
IR Included
✓ Included
✓ Included
Response SLA
≤30 minutes
20m
24/7 Coverage
✓ Yes
✓ Yes
Channels
EmailPortalPhone
EmailPortalPhone
Data Access
Dashboards
Dashboards
Model
Subscription-based with one-year and multi-year plans; per-user or deployment size based; three tiers (MDR, MDR 360, MXDR 360)
Per-seat/device, custom-quoted; available as add-on to ESET PROTECT Enterprise or Elite tiers. MSP pricing with daily billing or monthly invoicing.
Price Range
Custom-quoted; pricing based on scale, modules, and deployment size. Generally perceived as high-end/premium pricing.
Custom-quoted based on environment and device count; volume discounts available
Minimum Seats
None
25
Threat Hunting
✓ Included
✓ Included
Overall
Mixed
Positive
Summary
Valued by large enterprises already in the Check Point ecosystem as a powerful security partner. Strong detection capabilities backed by ThreatCloud AI and 450+ experts. However, perceived as expensive, with licensing complexity and limited appeal outside the existing Check Point customer base.
Recognized as Market Leader and Product Leader in MDR by KuppingerCole 2024. Praised for fast 20-minute response times, strong threat intelligence from 30+ years of research, and good SMB accessibility. Criticized for UI/UX issues and the ESET console interface being unintuitive for US users.
Check Point vs ESET: Which Should You Choose?
Choose Check Point if:
- You need active remediation
- ≤30 minutes response time meets your needs
- You prefer technology agnostic solutions
- Your org size: SMB / Mid-market / Enterprise
Choose ESET if:
- You need active remediation
- 20m response time meets your needs
- You prefer platform native solutions
- Your org size: SMB / Mid-market / Enterprise
FAQ
What's the main difference between Check Point and ESET?
Key differences: response model (Active Remediation vs Active Remediation), SLA (≤30 minutes vs 20m), and approach (Technology Agnostic vs Platform Native).