Binary Defense vs ThreatDown: MDR Comparison 2026
Binary Defense (Pure-play MDR) and ThreatDown (MDR provider) take different approaches to managed detection and response. Binary Defense works with your existing tools, while ThreatDown requires its own security platform. Binary Defense targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; ThreatDown focuses on SMB and Mid-market. Binary Defense includes 5 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 1 for ThreatDown (Endpoint).
Key Differences at a Glance
Winner by Category
Binary Defense vs ThreatDown: Which Should You Choose?
Choose Binary Defense if:
- •Mid-market and enterprise organizations wanting technology-agnostic MDR
- •Companies with existing security investments (EDR, SIEM) they want to keep
- •Manufacturing, healthcare, financial services, and energy sectors
- •You need Cloud and SaaS and Identity and Network coverage included in base pricing
Choose ThreatDown if:
- •SMBs and IT-constrained mid-market organizations wanting affordable MDR with published pricing ($99/endpoint/year)
- •MSPs wanting channel-first MDR with multi-tenant OneView console and RMM integrations
- •Organizations needing fast deployment — agent installs in minutes, MDR activates immediately
Bottom line: ThreatDown is the choice if you want a single-vendor stack with deep integration. Binary Defense is better if you have existing tools and want flexibility.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between Binary Defense and ThreatDown?
Binary Defense is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). ThreatDown is a MDR provider that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). Binary Defense covers 5 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 1 for ThreatDown.
How do Binary Defense and ThreatDown differ in response capabilities?
Binary Defense supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. ThreatDown supports 3 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, file quarantine) and approval is configurable.
How does Binary Defense pricing compare to ThreatDown?
Binary Defense pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. ThreatDown pricing: MDR included at $99/endpoint/year (Elite) or $119/endpoint/year (Ultimate). Server endpoints: $129-179/year. Mobile: $10/device. (5-seat minimum). Watch for with Binary Defense: MDR Plus features (deception, malware disruption) are add-ons beyond base MDR; Co-Managed SIEM is a separate service. Watch for with ThreatDown: Endpoint-only coverage — no cloud workload, SaaS, identity, or network monitoring; Platform-native lock-in — cannot BYO CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, or Defender.
Should I choose Binary Defense or ThreatDown?
Choose Binary Defense if: mid-market and enterprise organizations wanting technology-agnostic MDR. Choose ThreatDown if: sMBs and IT-constrained mid-market organizations wanting affordable MDR with published pricing ($99/endpoint/year). Binary Defense is not ideal for organizations needing included IR in the base MDR package. ThreatDown is not ideal for enterprise organizations needing multi-surface coverage (cloud, SaaS, identity, network, OT).