Binary Defense vs SentinelOne: MDR Comparison 2026
Binary Defense (Pure-play MDR) and SentinelOne (EDR vendor) take different approaches to managed detection and response. Binary Defense works with your existing tools, while SentinelOne requires its own security platform. Binary Defense targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; SentinelOne focuses on Mid-market and Enterprise. Binary Defense includes 5 attack surfaces in base pricing (Endpoint, Cloud, SaaS, Identity, Network), compared to 3 for SentinelOne (Endpoint, Cloud, Identity).
Key Differences at a Glance
Winner by Category
Binary Defense vs SentinelOne: Which Should You Choose?
Choose Binary Defense if:
- •Mid-market and enterprise organizations wanting technology-agnostic MDR
- •Companies with existing security investments (EDR, SIEM) they want to keep
- •Manufacturing, healthcare, financial services, and energy sectors
- •You need SaaS and Network coverage included in base pricing
- •You want direct Slack integration with your SOC
Choose SentinelOne if:
- •Organizations already running SentinelOne Singularity wanting platform-native MDR without adding another vendor
- •Mid-market and enterprise organizations wanting $1M breach response warranty as financial backstop
- •Organizations valuing AI-first detection with Purple AI and Google Threat Intelligence integration
- •Breach warranty matters to you (SentinelOne offers one, Binary Defense does not)
Bottom line: SentinelOne is the choice if you want a single-vendor stack with deep integration. Binary Defense is better if you have existing tools and want flexibility.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between Binary Defense and SentinelOne?
Binary Defense is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). SentinelOne is an EDR vendor that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). SLA commitments differ: Binary Defense offers Not disclosed, SentinelOne offers ≤1 hour. Binary Defense covers 5 attack surfaces in base pricing vs. 3 for SentinelOne.
How do Binary Defense and SentinelOne differ in response capabilities?
Binary Defense supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. SentinelOne supports 5 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable.
How does Binary Defense pricing compare to SentinelOne?
Binary Defense pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. SentinelOne pricing: MDR add-on: ~$17-35/endpoint/year (standard) or ~$35-50/endpoint/year (Pro/Elite). Total: ~$197-280/endpoint/year for platform + MDR. Example: 1,000 endpoints x $35 MDR x 5 years = ~$175K MDR add-on cost.. Watch for with Binary Defense: MDR Plus features (deception, malware disruption) are add-ons beyond base MDR; Co-Managed SIEM is a separate service. Watch for with SentinelOne: Platform license ($69.99-$229.99/endpoint/year) is required BEFORE MDR — significant prerequisite cost; MDR pricing is a bolt-on fee separate from platform licensing — not shown on public pricing page.
Should I choose Binary Defense or SentinelOne?
Choose Binary Defense if: mid-market and enterprise organizations wanting technology-agnostic MDR. Choose SentinelOne if: organizations already running SentinelOne Singularity wanting platform-native MDR without adding another vendor. Binary Defense is not ideal for organizations needing included IR in the base MDR package. SentinelOne is not ideal for organizations running CrowdStrike, Microsoft Defender, or any non-SentinelOne EDR — platform-native lock-in.