Binary Defense vs N-able: MDR Comparison 2026
Binary Defense (Pure-play MDR) and N-able (MSP-channel) take different approaches to managed detection and response. Binary Defense works with your existing tools, while N-able works with your existing tools. Binary Defense targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; N-able focuses on SMB and Mid-market.
Key Differences at a Glance
Winner by Category
Binary Defense vs N-able: Which Should You Choose?
Choose Binary Defense if:
- •Mid-market and enterprise organizations wanting technology-agnostic MDR
- •Companies with existing security investments (EDR, SIEM) they want to keep
- •Manufacturing, healthcare, financial services, and energy sectors
- •You want direct Slack integration with your SOC
Choose N-able if:
- •MSPs wanting a unified security platform with built-in SIEM/SOAR/UEBA
- •SMBs and mid-market needing breach warranty protection
- •Organizations wanting vendor-agnostic MDR that works with existing EDR
- •Breach warranty matters to you (N-able offers one, Binary Defense does not)
Bottom line: Binary Defense (Pure-play MDR) and N-able (MSP-channel) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Binary Defense's binary defense stands out for its open xdr approach that works with your existing stack rather th... or N-able's unified security operations platform combining xdr, siem, soar, and ueba with mdr in one solution.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between Binary Defense and N-able?
Binary Defense is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). N-able is a MSP-channel that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools).
How do Binary Defense and N-able differ in response capabilities?
Binary Defense supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. N-able supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Incident response is not included with Binary Defense and included with N-able.
How does Binary Defense pricing compare to N-able?
Binary Defense pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. N-able pricing: MSPs typically bundle at $90-$275/user/month for full security programs including MDR. Watch for with Binary Defense: MDR Plus features (deception, malware disruption) are add-ons beyond base MDR; Co-Managed SIEM is a separate service. Watch for with N-able: Pricing designed for MSP channel; direct pricing may differ; MDR Base is identity-focused only; Complete needed for full coverage.
Should I choose Binary Defense or N-able?
Choose Binary Defense if: mid-market and enterprise organizations wanting technology-agnostic MDR. Choose N-able if: mSPs wanting a unified security platform with built-in SIEM/SOAR/UEBA. Binary Defense is not ideal for organizations needing included IR in the base MDR package. N-able is not ideal for large enterprises with existing SOC infrastructure.