Barracuda Networks vs Red Canary: MDR Comparison 2026
Barracuda Networks (MSP-channel) and Red Canary (Pure-play MDR) take different approaches to managed detection and response. Barracuda Networks works with your existing tools, while Red Canary works with your existing tools. Barracuda Networks targets SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise organizations; Red Canary focuses on SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise.
Key Differences at a Glance
Winner by Category
Barracuda Networks vs Red Canary: Which Should You Choose?
Choose Barracuda Networks if:
- •MSPs needing a white-label/managed XDR for SMB clients
- •SMBs that don't have a security team and want turnkey coverage
- •Organizations using Microsoft 365 and needing email + endpoint coverage
Choose Red Canary if:
- •Organizations wanting detection-as-code with all detections mapped to MITRE ATT&CK for transparency
- •Linux-heavy environments needing purpose-built Linux EDR (eBPF/Audit) for containers and Kubernetes
- •Security teams wanting Slack-native SOC communication with configurable automated response playbooks
- •You want direct Slack integration with your SOC
Bottom line: Barracuda Networks (MSP-channel) and Red Canary (Pure-play MDR) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Barracuda Networks's purpose-built for the msp channel or Red Canary's vendor-agnostic mdr with 9 edr platform integrations, detection-as-code methodology, and the stro....
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between Barracuda Networks and Red Canary?
Barracuda Networks is a MSP-channel that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Red Canary is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). SLA commitments differ: Barracuda Networks offers ≤1 hour, Red Canary offers Not disclosed.
How do Barracuda Networks and Red Canary differ in response capabilities?
Barracuda Networks supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Red Canary supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with Barracuda Networks and not included with Red Canary.
How does Barracuda Networks pricing compare to Red Canary?
Barracuda Networks pricing: ~$14.50/endpoint/year (3-year endpoint); ~$8–$20/user/month depending on coverage scope. Minimum 25 licenses. (25-seat minimum). Red Canary pricing: Not publicly disclosed. User-reported: ~$100/endpoint/year (2023 PeerSpot data point, may have changed). Available through AWS Marketplace.. Watch for with Barracuda Networks: Security logs not available for download — limits forensic independence; MSP-focused pricing may differ from direct enterprise pricing. Watch for with Red Canary: Pricing not publicly disclosed — requires sales engagement for any quote; Resource-based pricing (per-endpoint + per-user + per-cloud) can scale unexpectedly.
Should I choose Barracuda Networks or Red Canary?
Choose Barracuda Networks if: mSPs needing a white-label/managed XDR for SMB clients. Choose Red Canary if: mid-market organizations wanting vendor-agnostic MDR that works with their existing EDR (CrowdStrike, Microsoft, SentinelOne, Carbon Black, Cortex XDR, Trend Micro, Jamf). Barracuda Networks is not ideal for enterprises wanting full data access and log export capabilities. Red Canary is not ideal for global organizations needing follow-the-sun SOC coverage — only Denver SOC confirmed.