Barracuda Networks vs Mandiant: MDR Comparison 2026
Barracuda Networks (MSP-channel) and Mandiant (Services firm) take different approaches to managed detection and response. Barracuda Networks works with your existing tools, while Mandiant works with your existing tools. Barracuda Networks targets SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise organizations; Mandiant focuses on Mid-market and Enterprise.
Key Differences at a Glance
Winner by Category
Barracuda Networks vs Mandiant: Which Should You Choose?
Choose Barracuda Networks if:
- •MSPs needing a white-label/managed XDR for SMB clients
- •SMBs that don't have a security team and want turnkey coverage
- •Organizations using Microsoft 365 and needing email + endpoint coverage
Choose Mandiant if:
- •Enterprise organizations wanting elite threat intelligence integrated directly into MDR operations
- •Google Cloud Platform customers wanting native SecOps integration
- •Organizations facing nation-state or advanced persistent threats where Mandiant's frontline IR experience is critical
Bottom line: Barracuda Networks (MSP-channel) and Mandiant (Services firm) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Barracuda Networks's purpose-built for the msp channel or Mandiant's threat intelligence-driven mdr backed by 500+ intel analysts, frontline ir experience, and google....
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between Barracuda Networks and Mandiant?
Barracuda Networks is a MSP-channel that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Mandiant is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). SLA commitments differ: Barracuda Networks offers ≤1 hour, Mandiant offers Not disclosed.
How do Barracuda Networks and Mandiant differ in response capabilities?
Barracuda Networks supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Mandiant supports 2 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with Barracuda Networks and not included with Mandiant.
How does Barracuda Networks pricing compare to Mandiant?
Barracuda Networks pricing: ~$14.50/endpoint/year (3-year endpoint); ~$8–$20/user/month depending on coverage scope. Minimum 25 licenses. (25-seat minimum). Mandiant pricing: Estimated ~$83,000/year (third-party estimate from Vendr, not officially published).. Watch for with Barracuda Networks: Security logs not available for download — limits forensic independence; MSP-focused pricing may differ from direct enterprise pricing. Watch for with Mandiant: ~$83K+/year estimated — premium enterprise pricing; IR retainer is separate — must be purchased independently for full incident response.
Should I choose Barracuda Networks or Mandiant?
Choose Barracuda Networks if: mSPs needing a white-label/managed XDR for SMB clients. Choose Mandiant if: enterprise organizations wanting elite threat intelligence integrated directly into MDR operations. Barracuda Networks is not ideal for enterprises wanting full data access and log export capabilities. Mandiant is not ideal for sMBs or budget-constrained organizations — ~$83K+/year estimated pricing.