Check Point vs Kroll: MDR Comparison 2026
Detailed comparison of Check Point and Kroll managed detection and response services. Compare response capabilities, SLA, coverage, integrations, and compliance.
Winner by Category
Response Level
Tie
Same level
SLA Speed
Check Point
Faster response time
Coverage Breadth
Kroll
6 vs 5 surfaces
Integrations
Kroll
More integration options
Criteria
Enterprise-grade MDR backed by ThreatCloud AI and 450+ security experts, with an industry-leading 160+ integrations for vendor-neutral coverage. Best for organizations wanting comprehensive coverage across all attack surfaces from a vendor with deep network security heritage.
Kroll Responder's unique advantage is the depth of real-world incident response experience from 3,000+ annual breach investigations feeding directly into MDR detection and response. The 'Complete Response' methodology and complimentary $1M breach warranty set it apart from pure monitoring-focused MDR providers.
Response Type
Active Remediation
Active Remediation
Approval Policy
Configurable
Configurable
Auto-Isolate
✓
✓
Kill Process
✓
✓
IR Included
✓ Included
✓ Included
Response SLA
≤30 minutes
Contact for specifics
24/7 Coverage
✓ Yes
✓ Yes
Channels
EmailPortalPhone
EmailPortalPhone
Data Access
Dashboards
Dashboards
Model
Subscription-based with one-year and multi-year plans; per-user or deployment size based; three tiers (MDR, MDR 360, MXDR 360)
Custom pricing based on environment size and complexity
Price Range
Custom-quoted; pricing based on scale, modules, and deployment size. Generally perceived as high-end/premium pricing.
Not published
Minimum Seats
None
None
Threat Hunting
✓ Included
✓ Included
Overall
Mixed
Positive
Summary
Valued by large enterprises already in the Check Point ecosystem as a powerful security partner. Strong detection capabilities backed by ThreatCloud AI and 450+ experts. However, perceived as expensive, with licensing complexity and limited appeal outside the existing Check Point customer base.
Highly trusted for deep incident response pedigree and 'Complete Response' methodology. 98% customer satisfaction score and 75 NPS. Strong reputation for going beyond containment to full eradication. Lower market mindshare than some larger MDR brands.
Check Point vs Kroll: Which Should You Choose?
Choose Check Point if:
- You need active remediation
- ≤30 minutes response time meets your needs
- You prefer technology agnostic solutions
- Your org size: SMB / Mid-market / Enterprise
Choose Kroll if:
- You need active remediation
- Contact for specifics response time meets your needs
- You prefer technology agnostic solutions
- Your org size: SMB / Mid-market / Enterprise
FAQ
What's the main difference between Check Point and Kroll?
Key differences: response model (Active Remediation vs Active Remediation), SLA (≤30 minutes vs Contact for specifics), and approach (Technology Agnostic vs Technology Agnostic).