Check Point vs Field Effect: MDR Comparison 2026
Check Point (Services firm) and Field Effect (MDR provider) take different approaches to managed detection and response. Check Point works with your existing tools, while Field Effect requires its own security platform. Check Point targets SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise organizations; Field Effect focuses on SMB and Mid-market.
Key Differences at a Glance
Winner by Category
Check Point vs Field Effect: Which Should You Choose?
Choose Check Point if:
- •Large enterprises already invested in Check Point infrastructure
- •Organizations needing vendor-neutral MDR with 160+ integrations
- •Companies requiring coverage across network, endpoint, email, cloud, and IoT simultaneously
Choose Field Effect if:
- •SMBs and MSPs wanting affordable, easy-to-deploy MDR with published per-user pricing
- •Canadian organizations needing domestic data hosting and PIPEDA compliance
- •Healthcare, government, and defense contractors needing HIPAA/CMMC/NIST compliance support
Bottom line: Field Effect is the choice if you want a single-vendor stack with deep integration. Check Point is better if you have existing tools and want flexibility.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between Check Point and Field Effect?
Check Point is a Services firm that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Field Effect is a MDR provider that is platform-native (requires their own security stack). SLA commitments differ: Check Point offers ≤30 minutes, Field Effect offers Not disclosed.
How do Check Point and Field Effect differ in response capabilities?
Check Point supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Field Effect supports 5 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine) and approval is configurable. Incident response is included with Check Point and not included with Field Effect.
How does Check Point pricing compare to Field Effect?
Check Point pricing: Custom-quoted; pricing based on scale, modules, and deployment size. Generally perceived as high-end/premium pricing.. Field Effect pricing: MDR Core: $99/user/month (ideal for <=25 users). MDR Complete: custom pricing (larger organizations, compliance requirements).. Watch for with Check Point: Cost scales significantly with modules and user count; ATAM 360 dedicated account management is an additional subscription. Watch for with Field Effect: MDR Core excludes network monitoring, DNS firewall, and dark web monitoring — significant feature gap vs Complete; $99/user adds up quickly — 50 users = $4,950/month.
Should I choose Check Point or Field Effect?
Choose Check Point if: large enterprises already invested in Check Point infrastructure. Choose Field Effect if: sMBs and MSPs wanting affordable, easy-to-deploy MDR with published per-user pricing. Check Point is not ideal for sMBs with limited budgets (premium pricing). Field Effect is not ideal for organizations with existing CrowdStrike/SentinelOne/Defender deployments — requires proprietary Field Effect agent.