Blumira vs Field Effect: MDR Comparison 2026
Detailed comparison of Blumira and Field Effect managed detection and response services. Compare response capabilities, SLA, coverage, integrations, and compliance.
Winner by Category
Response Level
Tie
Same level
SLA Speed
Field Effect
Faster response time
Coverage Breadth
Tie
Same coverage
Integrations
Field Effect
More integration options
Response Type
Active Remediation
Active Remediation
Approval Policy
N/A
N/A
Auto-Isolate
✗
✗
Kill Process
✗
✗
IR Included
Separate
Separate
Response SLA
sub-30-min
Not disclosed
24/7 Coverage
✓ Yes
✓ Yes
Channels
N/A
N/A
Data Access
N/A
N/A
Model
Not published
Not published
Price Range
Not published
Not published
Minimum Seats
N/A
N/A
Threat Hunting
N/A
N/A
Overall
N/A
N/A
Summary
N/A
N/A
Blumira vs Field Effect: Which Should You Choose?
Choose Blumira if:
- You need active remediation
- sub-30-min response time meets your needs
- You prefer platform native solutions
- Your org size: SMB / Mid-market
Choose Field Effect if:
- You need active remediation
- Not disclosed response time meets your needs
- You prefer technology agnostic solutions
- Your org size: SMB / Mid-market
FAQ
What's the main difference between Blumira and Field Effect?
Key differences: response model (Active Remediation vs Active Remediation), SLA (sub-30-min vs Not disclosed), and approach (Platform Native vs Technology Agnostic).