Binary Defense vs Kroll: MDR Comparison 2026
Binary Defense (Pure-play MDR) and Kroll (MDR provider) take different approaches to managed detection and response. Binary Defense works with your existing tools, while Kroll works with your existing tools. Binary Defense targets Mid-market and Enterprise organizations; Kroll focuses on SMB, Mid-market, and Enterprise.
Key Differences at a Glance
Winner by Category
Binary Defense vs Kroll: Which Should You Choose?
Choose Binary Defense if:
- •Mid-market and enterprise organizations wanting technology-agnostic MDR
- •Companies with existing security investments (EDR, SIEM) they want to keep
- •Manufacturing, healthcare, financial services, and energy sectors
- •You want direct Slack integration with your SOC
Choose Kroll if:
- •Organizations wanting IR expertise built into MDR -- 3,000+ annual cases feeding detection, not just monitoring
- •Enterprises needing full threat eradication including forensics and root cause analysis, not just containment
- •Regulated industries needing compliance reporting, IR pedigree, and included $1M breach warranty
- •Breach warranty matters to you (Kroll offers one, Binary Defense does not)
Bottom line: Binary Defense (Pure-play MDR) and Kroll (MDR provider) serve different buyer profiles. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize Binary Defense's binary defense stands out for its open xdr approach that works with your existing stack rather th... or Kroll's kroll responder's differentiator is depth of real-world ir experience: 3,000+ annual breach inves....
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between Binary Defense and Kroll?
Binary Defense is a Pure-play MDR that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools). Kroll is a MDR provider that is technology-agnostic (works with your existing tools).
How do Binary Defense and Kroll differ in response capabilities?
Binary Defense supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Kroll supports 6 autonomous actions (endpoint isolation, process termination, network containment, account disable, file quarantine, custom playbooks) and approval is configurable. Incident response is not included with Binary Defense and included with Kroll.
How does Binary Defense pricing compare to Kroll?
Binary Defense pricing: Custom-quoted pricing. Kroll pricing: Not publicly disclosed. Unverified field estimates suggest $30K-$200K+/year depending on scope.. Watch for with Binary Defense: MDR Plus features (deception, malware disruption) are add-ons beyond base MDR; Co-Managed SIEM is a separate service. Watch for with Kroll: CrowdStrike Falcon Complete migration (Dec 2025) increases platform dependency -- customers wanting vendor-agnostic EDR lose that flexibility; Named TAM support (vs. Shared TAM) likely incurs additional cost; cost delta not disclosed.
Should I choose Binary Defense or Kroll?
Choose Binary Defense if: mid-market and enterprise organizations wanting technology-agnostic MDR. Choose Kroll if: organizations wanting IR expertise built into MDR -- 3,000+ annual cases feeding detection, not just monitoring. Binary Defense is not ideal for organizations needing included IR in the base MDR package. Kroll is not ideal for organizations that need vendor-agnostic EDR choice (CrowdStrike migration reduces flexibility).