Armor vs IronNet: MDR Comparison 2026
Detailed comparison of Armor and IronNet managed detection and response services. Compare response capabilities, SLA, coverage, integrations, and compliance.
Winner by Category
Response Level
Tie
Same level
SLA Speed
Tie
Same speed
Coverage Breadth
Armor
5 vs 1 surfaces
Integrations
Armor
More integration options
Response Type
Active Remediation
Active Remediation
Approval Policy
N/A
N/A
Auto-Isolate
✗
✗
Kill Process
✗
✗
IR Included
Separate
Separate
Response SLA
Not disclosed
Not disclosed
24/7 Coverage
✓ Yes
✓ Yes
Channels
N/A
N/A
Data Access
N/A
N/A
Model
Not published
Not published
Price Range
Not published
Not published
Minimum Seats
N/A
N/A
Threat Hunting
N/A
N/A
Overall
N/A
N/A
Summary
N/A
N/A
Armor vs IronNet: Which Should You Choose?
Choose Armor if:
- You need active remediation
- Not disclosed response time meets your needs
- You prefer platform native solutions
- Your org size: Mid-market / Enterprise
Choose IronNet if:
- You need active remediation
- Not disclosed response time meets your needs
- You prefer platform native solutions
- Your org size: Enterprise
FAQ
What's the main difference between Armor and IronNet?
Key differences: response model (Active Remediation vs Active Remediation), SLA (Not disclosed vs Not disclosed), and approach (Platform Native vs Platform Native).