Armor vs Critical Start: MDR Comparison 2026
Detailed comparison of Armor and Critical Start managed detection and response services. Compare response capabilities, SLA, coverage, integrations, and compliance.
Winner by Category
Response Level
Tie
Same level
SLA Speed
Armor
Faster response time
Coverage Breadth
Tie
Same coverage
Integrations
Armor
More integration options
Response Type
Active Remediation
Active Remediation
Approval Policy
N/A
N/A
Auto-Isolate
✗
✗
Kill Process
✗
✗
IR Included
Separate
Separate
Response SLA
Not disclosed
15-min
24/7 Coverage
✓ Yes
✓ Yes
Channels
N/A
N/A
Data Access
N/A
N/A
Model
Not published
Not published
Price Range
Not published
Not published
Minimum Seats
N/A
N/A
Threat Hunting
N/A
N/A
Overall
N/A
N/A
Summary
N/A
N/A
Armor vs Critical Start: Which Should You Choose?
Choose Armor if:
- You need active remediation
- Not disclosed response time meets your needs
- You prefer platform native solutions
- Your org size: Mid-market / Enterprise
Choose Critical Start if:
- You need active remediation
- 15-min response time meets your needs
- You prefer technology agnostic solutions
- Your org size: Enterprise
FAQ
What's the main difference between Armor and Critical Start?
Key differences: response model (Active Remediation vs Active Remediation), SLA (Not disclosed vs 15-min), and approach (Platform Native vs Technology Agnostic).